King v. Castaneda et al

6:26-cv-06012Arwd23 de mar. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
RYAN R. KING 	PLAINTIFF
v. 	Case No. 6:26-cv-6012
OFFICER CASTANEDA and
OFFICER MORPHEW 	DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed on February 27, 2026, by the
Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
ECF No. 5. Judge Ford recommends that this case be dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff has
not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, finding no clear error on the face of the record and that Judge
Ford’s reasoning is sound, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) in toto.
Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 23rd day of March, 2026.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Case 6:26-cv-06012-SOH Document 6 Filed 03/23/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.