6:26-cv-06012•King v. Castaneda et al
Texto completo
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION RYAN R. KING PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 6:26-cv-6012 OFFICER CASTANEDA and OFFICER MORPHEW DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed on February 27, 2026, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 5. Judge Ford recommends that this case be dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, finding no clear error on the face of the record and that Judge Ford’s reasoning is sound, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) in toto. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 23rd day of March, 2026. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge Case 6:26-cv-06012-SOH Document 6 Filed 03/23/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.