Russell v. McMurry

6:25-cv-06099Arwd27 de jan. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
ERIC DEMOND RUSSELL 	PLAINTIFF
V. 	CASE NO. 6:25-CV-6099
WAYNE MCMURRY 	DEFENDANT
ORDER
Now before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) of the
Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of
Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties.
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds
that the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED
IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted. Plaintiff is warned that, in the future, this dismissal may be counted as a strike
for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and thus, the Clerk is directed to place a § 1915(g)
strike flag on the case for future judicial consideration.
IT IS SO ORDERED on this 27th day of January, 2026.
/s/ Timothy L. Brooks
TIMOTHY L. BROOKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 6:25-cv-06099-TLB Document 16 Filed 01/27/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.