5:26-cv-05034•Greene v. St. Vincent De Paul - Cardinal Manning Center
Greene v. St. Vincent De Paul - Cardinal Manning Center
5:26-cv-05034Arwd18 de fev. de 2026
Texto completo
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION CEDRIC GREENE PLAINTIFF V. CASE NO. 5:26-CV-5034 ST. VINCENT DE PAUL – CARDINAL MANNING CENTER DEFENDANT ORDER On February 10, 2026, the Honorable Christy Comstock, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, performed an initial screening of the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 5) finding that the case should be dismissed. On February 17, 2026, Plaintiff filed Objections to the R&R (Doc. 7), which triggered this Court’s de novo review of the record. The R&R explains why the Court lacks diversity jurisdiction over this case: Plaintiff and Defendant are both citizens of California. Plaintiff claims in his Objections that he should be considered an Arkansas citizen—though he is not domiciled here—because it is “the state he considers home, with family and resource support.” (Doc. 7, p. 2). This is insufficient to establish Arkansas citizenship as a matter of law. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Objections are OVERRULED and the R&R is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. The case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE on preservice screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) for the reasons stated in the R&R. Case 5:26-cv-05034-TLB Document 8 Filed 02/18/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
2 IT IS SO ORDERED on this 18th day of February, 2026. /s/ Timothy L. Brooks TIMOTHY L. BROOKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 5:26-cv-05034-TLB Document 8 Filed 02/18/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.