Owens v. Ms. Michelle Waller et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
MARCUS ONEIL
LAQUIENT OWENS 	PLAINTIFF
v. 	Case No. 4:24-cv-04057
MS. MICHELLE WALLER;
MS. KATHLEEN ARNOLD;
SHERIFF WAYNE EASLEY;
and WARDEN JEFFIE WALKER 	DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed February 28, 2025, by the
Honorable Christy D. Comstock, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of
Arkansas. (ECF No. 26). Judge Comstock recommends that Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment (ECF No. 17) be denied because Plaintiff fully exhausted his administrative remedies.
(ECF No. 26, at 13).
Defendants have not responded to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so
has passed.1 See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, finding no clear error on the face of the
record and that Judge Comstock’s reasoning is sound, the Court adopts the Report and
Recommendation (ECF No. 26) in toto. 	Accordingly, the Court finds that Defendants’ Motion
for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17) should be and hereby is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 10th day of April, 2025.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
Chief United States District Judge
1The Court notes that Plaintiff has filed an Objection (ECF No. 27) and a Supplement (ECF No. 28) to the Report
and Recommendation. However, neither document appears to contain specific objections.
Case 4:24-cv-04057-JTS Document 31 Filed 04/10/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>