Odom v. Marion County Quorum Court et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HARRISON DIVISION
MUIRNA LYNN ODOM 	PLAINTIFF
v. 	CIVIL NO. 3:25-03011
MARION COUNTY QUORUM COURT 	DEFENDANT
CHUCK VAN VELKINBURGH
SANDRA LEE
TRAVIS HOPSON
KOLTON JENSEN
JOHN REED
LESLIE KERWOOD
WESLEY SHIPMAN
TOMMY DORSEY
TOMMY DEAN JOHNSON
SHERIFF GREG ALEXANDER
DEPUTY RYAN BEASLY
JANE DOES 1-3
JOHN DOES 1-3
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On February 11, 2025, Plaintiff filed a Complaint pursuant 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No.
1). However, more information was needed, and Plaintiff was ordered to file an amended
complaint by April 3, 2025. (ECF No. 9). A Show Cause Order for failure to obey the order to file
an amended complaint was issued on April 4, 2025, and Plaintiff was directed to respond by April
25, 2025. (ECF No. 10). 	To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint and has not
responded to the Court’s Show Cause Order.
Therefore, it is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s case be DISMISSED without
prejudice on the grounds that she has failed to respond to a Court order. See Fed. R. Civ. Pro.
41(b). The parties have fourteen (14) days from receipt of the Report and Recommendation
in which to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely
objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. 	The parties are
Case 3:25-cv-03011-TLB Document 11 Filed 05/01/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the
district court.
RECOMMENDED this 1st day of May 2025.
.
HON. CHRISTY COMSTOCK
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case 3:25-cv-03011-TLB Document 11 Filed 05/01/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>