Scott et al v. Simmons Bank et al

4:25-cv-00905Ared28 de nov. de 2025

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
MEREDITH HAZEL SCOTT, et al. 	PLAINTIFF
v. 	Case No. 4:25-cv-00905-KGB
SIMMONS BANK, et al. 	DEFENDANT
ORDER
Before the Court is defendants Simmons Bank, George A. Makris, Jr., and George A.
Makris, III’s (“Defendants”) motion for leave to file reply brief (Dkt. No. 20). Defendants filed
motions to dismiss on November 4, 2025 (Dkt. Nos. 7; 13). Plaintiffs Paula Virginia Thomasson
and Meredith Hazel Scott filed their response to the motions to dismiss on November 17, 2025
(Dkt. No. 17). Defendants now seek leave to file a reply brief to “briefly address arguments raised
in Plaintiff’s brief to help clarify and streamline the issues for the Court” (Dkt. No. 20, ¶6). For
good cause shown, the Court grants Defendants’ motion (Id.). 	Defendants have until, and
including, December 5, 2025, to file their reply brief.
It is so ordered this 28th day of November, 2025.
___________________________
_______________________________ 	Kristine G. Baker
Chief United States District Judge
Case 4:25-cv-00905-KGB Document 21 Filed 11/28/25 Page 1 of 1

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.