Terry v. Seamster et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
JARELL D. TERRY 	PLAINTIFF
ADC #149998
v. 	Case No. 4:25-cv-00446 KGB-BBM
LONNELL SEAMSTER, JR., APN,
Wellpath, et al. 	DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore (Dkt. No. 15). No party has filed objections, and the time to
file objections has passed. Accordingly, after careful consideration, the Court concludes that the
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this
Court’s findings in all respects (Id.).
While plaintiff Jarrell D. Terry did not file timely objections to Judge Moore’s
Recommended Disposition, Terry has made several other filings. 	The Court dismisses without
prejudice Terry’s amended complaint and addendum (Dkt. Nos. 7; 8) for failure to comply with
the Court’s Order to pay the filing fee. 	The Court denies as moot Terry’s motion for writ of
mandamus (Dkt. No. 13), motion to amend relief (Dkt. No. 14), and emergency notification/writ
of mandamus (Dkt. Nos. 16). 	The Court grants Terry’s motion for copies (Dkt. No. 17). 	The
Clerk of the Court is instructed to send Terry a form for filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus
by a person in state custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, along with a copy of the docket sheet in this
matter.
The Court has considered Terry’s latest notice (Dkt. No. 18), and the declaration of Adam
Lane (Dkt. No. 19), but these filings do not break new ground. The Court agrees with Judge Moore
Case 4:25-cv-00446-KGB Document 20 Filed 11/18/25 Page 1 of 2

2
that Terry has failed to show that he is in imminent danger of harm (Dkt. No. 15). To date, Terry
has failed to pay the required filing fee. Therefore, the Court adopts the Recommended Disposition
and dismisses without prejudice Terry’s amended complaint and addendum (Dkt. Nos. 7; 8) for
failure to comply with the Court’s Order to pay the filing fee. The Court denies as moot Terry’s
motion for writ of mandamus and motion to amend relief (Dkt. Nos. 13; 14). The Court certifies,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the
accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
It is so ordered this 18th day of November, 2025.
_________________________________
Kristine G. Baker
Chief United States District Court Judge
Case 4:25-cv-00446-KGB Document 20 Filed 11/18/25 Page 2 of 2