Kimble v. Hamm et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DEAMFUS QUANTEZ KIMBLE, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
vs. 	) 	CIVIL ACTION: 1:25-cv-00042-JB-MU
)
JOHN HAMM, et al., 	)
)
Defendants. 	)
ORDER
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to
the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of
the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion
of this Court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint be and is hereby DISMISSED
without prejudice.
DONE and ORDERED this 28th day of May, 2025.
/s/ JEFFREY U. BEAVERSTOCK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:25-cv-00042-JB-MU Doc# 5 Filed 05/28/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID#
<pageID>