1:24-cv-00028•Lucy v. Securus Technologies et al
Texto completo
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM N. LUCY, AIS# 204880 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CIV. A. NO. 24-00028-KD-N ) SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection (doc. 11) is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to proceed without prepayment of fees is DENIED and Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. DONE this 27th day of March 2024. s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.