Carstarphen v. Reynolds et al

1:24-cv-00007Alsd7 de jul. de 2025

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ANDRE MAURICE CARSTARPHEN, JR., 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
vs. 	) 	CIVIL ACTION: 24-0007-KD-N
)
LEVEL REYNOLDS, et al., 	)
)
Defendants. 	)
ORDER
On June 3, 2025, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 53).
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues
raised, and no objections having been filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that
1) Summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of Defendant Dr. Ronald Perdue, and
Carstarphen’s claims against Dr. Perdue are DISMISSED with prejudice.
2) Defendants Warden Noah Price Oliver, Sgt. Carter, and Officer Brown’s motion for
summary judgment is DENIED.
This action remains pending as to Lieutenant Level Reynolds, Warden Oliver, Sgt.
Carter, and Officer Brown.
This action is set for jury selection and trial on March 3, 2026, and is referred to the
Magistrate Judge for a scheduling order consistent with this Order and the Report and
Recommendation.
DONE and ORDERED this the 7th day of July 2025.
/s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:24-cv-00007-KD-N Doc# 54 Filed 07/07/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID#
<pageID>

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.