Redfox v. Jones et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ALASKA
WYATT N. REDFOX,
Plaintiff,
v.
BRANDON JONES, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 3:21-cv-00005-SLG-MMS
ORDER
At Docket 27, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals referred this action back to
the District Court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis
status should continue.
Upon review, the Court determines that Mr. Redfox’s incarcerated and
indigent status has not changed. And the Court finds that at least Mr. Redfox’s
individual claims are not frivolous. Therefore, the district court finds that in forma
pauperis status should continue for this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see
also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002).
DATED this 18th day of October, 2021, at Anchorage, Alaska.
/s/ Sharon L. Gleason
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:21-cv-00005-SLG-MMS Document 28 Filed 10/18/21 Page 1 of 1