CourtListener 10868463•Ayesha Howard v. Alice Benton, Judge
Texto completo
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
June 02, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26O0019. AYESHA HOWARD v. ALICE BENTON, JUDGE.
Ayesha Howard filed in the Supreme Court of Georgia a petition for original
mandamus relief, requesting that the Court: (1) grant a stay of all proceedings in a
child support case; (2) vacate and set aside an order in the case; (3) dismiss the case;
(4) find that the opposing party in the case is barred by the unclean hands doctrine;
and (5) grant full faith and credit to the laws of California. The Supreme Court
transferred the petition here. Case No. S26O0909 (May 5, 2026). Because Howard
has not shown that this is one of those rare cases requiring the deployment of our
limited powers of original mandamus, we dismiss the petition.
“Generally, the superior courts of this state have the power, in proper cases, to
issue process in the nature of mandamus, prohibition, specific performance, quo
warranto, and injunction, and hence the need to resort to the appellate courts for such
relief by petition filed in the appellate courts will be extremely rare.” Brown v.
Johnson, 251 Ga. 436, 436 (306 SE2d 655) (1983); see also Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI,
Sec. I, Par. IV. As the Supreme Court of Georgia recently made clear, an appellate
court’s authority to issue such writs “is connected only to such powers as necessary
in aid of its jurisdiction or to protect or effectuate its judgments. It does not grant
jurisdiction to [the appellate court] to issue process as an original matter wholly
unconnected to its appellate jurisdiction.” Arnold v. Alexander, 321 Ga. 330, 334(1)
(914 SE2d 311) (2025) (punctuation omitted). Thus, except in the rarest of cases, the
procedure to be followed before seeking to invoke this Court’s original mandamus
jurisdiction is to file the petition in the appropriate lower court first. See Graham v.
Cavender, 252 Ga. 123, 123 (311 SE2d 832) (1984); Expedia, Inc. v. City of Columbus,
305 Ga. App. 450, 455(2)(b) (699 SE2d 600) (2010).
Here, there is no indication that Howard petitioned the superior court for a writ
of mandamus, and this is not one of the extremely rare instances in which this Court
will exercise its original jurisdiction. Thus, there is no basis for this Court to exercise
its jurisdiction, and this original petition is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
06/02/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.