CourtListener 10866187•Robert Wyatt v. State
Texto completo
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
May 29, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26A2025. ROBERT WYATT v. THE STATE.
In 1995, a jury convicted Robert Wyatt on charges of child molestation,
aggravated child molestation, aggravated sodomy, and incest against his five-year-old
daughter. Wyatt appealed his convictions, and we affirmed his convictions but
reversed and remanded for resentencing on counts that should have been merged.
Wyatt v. State, 222 Ga. App. 604 (475 SE2d 651) (1996). In January 2026, Wyatt filed
a motion for leave to file an out-of-time motion for a new trial. The trial court
dismissed that motion, and Wyatt filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction.
In Cook v. State, 313 Ga. 471, 506(5) (870 SE2d 758) (2022), the Supreme Court
of Georgia determined that a trial court lacks authority to grant an out-of-time appeal,
and that any remedy involving an out-of-time appeal must be sought in habeas corpus.
In response, the legislature enacted OCGA § 5-6-39.1, which became effective on May
14, 2025. This statute allows for defendants to seek out-of-time relief if (1) the
defendant moves for leave to file an out-of-time motion for new trial or notice of
appeal within 100 days from the expiration of the time period for the filing of such
motion or notice, or (2) the defendant had an out-of-time motion or appeal dismissed
under Cook. OCGA § 5-6-39.1(b). However, OCGA § 5-6-39.1(b) does not apply
here, as Wyatt did not file his motion for out-of-time motion for new trial within 100
days from the expiration of the time period for filing a motion for new trial, nor did
he have his motion or appeal dismissed under Cook.
Moreover, the remedies under OCGA § 5-6-39.1 are not available to Wyatt
because he has already had a direct appeal. Richards v. State, 275 Ga. 190, 191 (563
SE2d 856) (2002) (a criminal defendant whose conviction has been affirmed on direct
appeal has no right of direct appeal from the denial of a motion for an out-of-time
appeal); see also Milliken v. Stewart, 276 Ga. 712, 713 (583 SE2d 30) (2003). Instead,
such a defendant “may gain further appellate review of the judgment of conviction
by filing an extraordinary motion for new trial or a petition for writ of habeas corpus.”
Richards, 275 Ga. at 192 n.1.
For the above reasons, this Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal, which is
hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
05/29/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.