Florida Public Service Commission native order document 09136-2024

3 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

FILED 9/20/2024
DOCUMENT NO. 09136-2024
FPSC - COMMISSION CLERK

BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

DOCKET NO. 20240014-EG
ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0430-FOF-EG
ISSUED: September 20, 2024

In re: Commission review of numeric
conservation goals (Tampa Electric Company).

The following Commissioners participated in the disposition of this matter:

MIKE LA ROSA, Chairman
ART GRAHAM
GARY F. CLARK
ANDREW GILES FAY
GABRIELLA PASSIDOMO

FINAL ORDER APPROVING NUMERIC CONSERVATION GOALS
FOR TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY

APPEARANCES:

J. JEFFRY WAHLEN, MALCOLM N. MEANS and VIRGINIA PONDER,
ESQUIRES, Ausley & McMullen, Post Office Box 391, Tallahassee, Florida
32302

On behalf of Tampa Electric Company (TECQ).

SEAN T. GARNER, ERIK SAYLER and KELLY WRIGHT, ESQUIRES,
Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Service, Office of General
Counsel, The Mayo Building, 407 S. Calhoun Street, Suite 520, Tallahassee,
Florida 32399-0800

On behalf of Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services (FDACS).

JON C. MOYLE, JR. and KAREN A. PUTNAL, ESQUIRES, Moyle Law Firm,
P.A., 118 North Gadsden Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32301
On behalf of Florida Industrial Power Users Group (FIPUG).

BRADLEY MARSHALL and JORDAN LUEBKEMANN, ESQUIRES,
Earthjustice, 111 S. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Tallahassee, Florida 32301

On_ behalf of Florida Rising, Inc. (FL Rising) and League of United Latin
American Citizens (LULAC).

WILLIAM C. GARNER, ESQUIRE, Law Office of William C. Garner, PLLC,
3425 Bannerman Road, Unit 105, No. 414, Tallahassee, Florida 32312
On behalf of Southern Alliance for Clean Energy (SACE).

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0430-FOF-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240014-EG
PAGE 2
STEPHANIE U. EATON, ESQUIRE, Spilman, Thomas & Battle, PLLC, 110
Oakwood Drive, Suite 500, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103
STEVEN W. LEE, ESQUIRE, Qualified Representative, Spilman, Thomas &
Battle, PLLC, 1100 Bent Creek Blvd., Suite 101, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania
17050
On behalf of Walmart, Inc. (Walmart).
JACOB IMIG, JON RUBOTTOM, and ADRIA HARPER, ESQUIRES, Florida
Public Service Commission, 2540 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida
32399-0850
On behalf of the Florida Public Service Commission (Staff).
MARY ANNE HELTON, ESQUIRE, Deputy General Counsel, Florida Public
Service Commission, 2540 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-
0850
Advisor to the Florida Public Service Commission.
KEITH C. HETRICK, ESQUIRE, General Counsel, Florida Public Service
Commission, 2540 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0850
Florida Public Service Commission General Counsel.
BY THE COMMISSION:
Background
Enacted in 1980, Sections 366.80 through 366.83, and 403.519, Florida Statutes (F.S.),
are known collectively as the Florida Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act (FEECA).
FEECA requires us to adopt appropriate goals to increase the efficiency of energy consumption
and, pursuant to Section 366.82(6), F.S., we must review the goals of each utility subject to
FEECA at least every five years.
The six electric utilities subject to FEECA, collectively known as the FEECA Utilities,
are Florida Power & Light Company (FPL), Duke Energy Florida, LLC (DEF), Tampa Electric
Company (TECO), Florida Public Utilities Company (FPUC), JEA, and Orlando Utilities
Commission (OUC). Pursuant to Rule 25-17.0021, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.),
numeric goals were last established for the FEECA Utilities by Order No. PSC-19-0509-FOF-
EU, issued November 26, 2019. Therefore, new goals must be established by January 2025.
By Order No. PSC-2024-0022-PCO-EG, issued February 28, 2024, the dockets for each
of the FEECA Utilities were consolidated for purposes of hearing, and controlling dates and a
tentative list of issues were established.

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0430-FOF-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240014-EG
PAGE 3
We acknowledged the intervention of the Office of Public Counsel (OPC) on February
28, 2024.1 We acknowledged the intervention of the Florida Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services (FDACS) on April 24, 2024.2 The Florida Industrial Power Users Group
(FIPUG) 3 , the Florida League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC)4 , and Florida Rising,
Inc. (Florida Rising)5 were granted leave to intervene on April 25, 2024. The Southern Alliance
for Clean Energy (SACE) 6 and Walmart Inc. (Walmart)7 were granted leave to intervene on
April 30, 2024. OPC withdrew from the proceeding on May 22, 2024.8
Pursuant to Notice and in accordance with Rule 28-106.209, F.A.C., a hearing was held
on August 8, 2024, in Tallahassee, Florida, before the above commissioners.
Decision
Legal Background
FEECA directs us to promote four key priorities: (1) reducing and controlling the growth
rates of weather-sensitive peak demand and electricity usage, (2) increasing the efficiency and
cost-effectiveness 	of 	the 	production 	and 	consumption 	of 	electricity 	and 	natural 	gas, 	(3)
encouraging demand-side renewable energy systems, and (4) conserving expensive resources,
particularly petroleum fuel.9 The Legislature emphasized that it is critical to utilize “efficient and
cost-effective” conservation systems.10 Section 366.82, F.S., bifurcates our responsibility under
FEECA into two separately docketed proceedings. First, in the goalsetting dockets, we must
establish appropriate goals for increasing the efficiency of energy consumption and increasing
the development of demand-side renewable energy systems. Following the adoption of goals, in
the plan approval dockets, each FEECA Utility must file plans and programs to meet the goals
within its service area. The present docket was opened to address the first, goalsetting portion of
our FEECA proceedings for TECO.
FEECA requires that we establish goals designed to increase the conservation of
expensive resources, such as petroleum fuels; reduce and control the growth rates of electric
consumption; reduce the growth rates of weather-sensitive peak demand; and encourage
development of demand-side renewable energy resources.11 Section 366.82(3), F.S., prescribes
the following criteria for our evaluation of the conservation goals:
1 Order No. PSC-2024-0051-PCO-EG.
2 Order No. PSC-2024-0128-PCO-EG.
3 Order No. PSC-2024-0132-PCO-EG.
4 Order No. PSC-2024-0133-PCO-EG.
5 Order No. PSC-2024-0135-PCO-EG.
6 Order No. PSC-2024-0139-PCO-EG.
7 Order No. PSC-2024-0138-PCO-EG.
8 DN 00854-2024.
9 See Sections 366.81-366.82, F.S.
10 Section 366.81, F.S.
11 Section 366.82(2), F.S.

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0430-FOF-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240014-EG
PAGE 4
In developing the goals, the commission shall evaluate the full technical potential
of 	all 	available 	demand-side 	and 	supply-side 	conservation 	and 	efficiency
measures, including demand-side renewable energy systems. In establishing the
goals, the commission shall take into consideration:
(a) 	The costs and benefits to customers participating in the measure.
(b) 	The costs and benefits to the general body of ratepayers as a whole,
including utility incentives and participant contributions.
(c) 	The need for incentives to promote both customer-owned and utility-owned
energy efficiency and demand-side renewable energy systems.
(d) 	The costs imposed by state and federal regulations on the emission of
greenhouse gases.
The Commission implements FEECA for electric utilities through Rule 25-17.0021,
F.A.C. Pursuant to that rule, for each FEECA Utility, we establish annual kilowatt (KW) and
kilowatt-hour (KWh) goals for Residential and Commercial/Industrial customer classes.12 The
goals are based on (1) an assessment of the technical potential of available conservation and
efficiency measures, and (2) an estimate of the total cost-effective KW and KWh savings
reasonably achievable through demand-side management (DSM) programs in each utility’s
service area over a ten-year period.13 The goals we establish are annual targets for conservation,
with KW goals relating to seasonal—summer and winter—demand savings, and annual KWh
goals relating to annual energy savings.
Following the last goalsetting proceedings in 2019, after receiving feedback from the
utilities, intervenors, and interested persons, we amended Rule 25-17.0021, F.A.C., to streamline
our FEECA process by requiring utilities to file potential conservation programs along with their
proposed goals. This allows us to analyze the utilities’ proposed goals based upon energy (KWh)
and demand (KW) savings from customer participation in potential programs they plan to
implement, thus giving us better information as to the appropriateness of the goals. Thus,
although utility conservation plans and the underlying programs and measures to implement
those plans are not approved at this time, each utility must include sufficient information related
to the cost-effectiveness of its potential DSM programs to support the appropriateness of its
proposed goals.14
Analysis
Pursuant to Section 366.82, F.A.C., we must evaluate whether the goals requested by
TECO are appropriate. Pursuant to the Prehearing Order, Order No. PSC-2024-0293-PHO-EG,
issued August 2, 2024, a final list of issues was established for the consolidated hearing. Issues
1-7 address whether each utility, in developing its proposed goals, adequately addressed the
considerations prescribed by statute and Commission rule. Issue 8 addresses, for the purpose of
establishing goals for rate-regulated utilities, whether we should consider changing credit levels
12 Rule 25-17.0021(1), F.A.C.
13 Id.
14 Section 366.82(7), F.S., addresses how we must evaluate and approve the utilities’ plans to implement the
Commission-established goals during the subsequent plan approval proceeding.

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0430-FOF-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240014-EG
PAGE 5
for demand response programs in the FEECA goalsetting proceedings or in their base rate
proceedings. Issues 9-11 were specific only to FPL’s docket and thus not at issue for TECO.
Issues 12 and 13 are the ultimate issues addressing, in light of the preceding issues, what
conservation goals we should establish for TECO as required by Section 366.82, F.S.
Following a robust discovery process, we were presented with a series of proposed Type
II stipulations,15 set forth below in Attachment A, that fully resolved all issues in this docket.
TECO, LULAC, Florida Rising, SACE, and Walmart supported the stipulations. FIPUG
supported the stipulations on Issues 8A and 8B at the August 8, 2024, hearing and took no
position on all other stipulations. FDACS took no position on all issues. Commission staff
recommended approval of the proposed stipulations. We approved the proposed stipulations by a
bench vote at the August 8, 2024, hearing.
We find that each of the stipulations are supported by evidence in the record. We also
find that the testimony and exhibits in the record adequately address the statutory considerations
required by Section 366.82(3), F.S., and demonstrate that the goals stipulated for Issues 12 and
13, as set forth in Attachment A, will increase the conservation of expensive resources, such as
petroleum fuels; reduce and control the growth rates of electric consumption; reduce the growth
rates of weather-sensitive peak demand; and encourage development of demand-side renewable
energy resources. In particular, we found the testimony and exhibits of TECO witnesses Jim
Herndon and Mark Roche, as well as the discovery responses provided by TECO, support our
finding that the stipulated goals are reasonable and consistent with the requirements of Section
366.82, F.S., and Rule 25-17.0021, F.A.C. For these reasons, we find the stipulated goals to be
appropriate.
Conclusion
The 	stipulations 	listed in 	Attachment 	A 	address 	all 	the 	requirements 	of 	FEECA
enumerated in Section 366.82, F.S., and satisfy the requirements of Rule 25-17.0021, F.A.C.
Further, the conservation goals stipulated in Issues 12 and 13 are appropriate to advance the
priorities of FEECA. Therefore, the goals stipulated in Issues 12 and 13 are adopted for TECO
for the period 2025-2034.
Based on the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that Tampa Electric Company shall abide by the stipulations, findings, and
rulings herein. It is further
ORDERED 	that 	Tampa 	Electric 	Company’s 	residential 	and 	commercial/industrial
summer and winter megawatt (MW) and annual gigawatt-hour (GWh) goals are adopted as set
forth in Attachment A, Paragraph 6, Issue 12. It is further
15 A Type II stipulation is one in which the utility and Commission staff, or the utility and at least one party
adversarial to the utility, agree on the resolution of an issue, and the remaining parties (including staff if they do not
join in the agreement) do not object to the Commission relying on the agreed language to resolve that issue in a final
order.

ORDER NO. PS C-2024-0430-FOF- EG
DOCKET NO. 202400 14-EG
PA GE6
O RD ERED that Ta mp a Electric Co mp any s hou ld co nt inu e to imp leme nt th e provisions
of Rul e 25-6.065, F .A .C., Interco nn ection a nd Net Me tering of Customer -O wned Renewable
Generation, as an appropri ate mea ns to enco ur age th e developme nt of demand-s ide renewable
ene rg y. It is further
JOI
ORDERED that thi s docket sha ll be closed after th e time fo r filin g an a pp ea l has run.
By ORDER of th e Florida Publi c Serv ice Co mmi ss ion this 20 th da y of Septe mb er, 2024.
Co mmi ss ion 	lerk
Flo rid a Public Servi e Co mmiss ion
2540 S hum ard Oak Bouleva rd
Ta ll ahassee, Fl orida 32399
(850) 41 3-6770
www.floridapsc.com
Copies furni shed: A copy of this docume nt 	is
provided to th e pa rti es of reco rd at the tim e of
issuance and, if app licable, interested perso ns.

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0430-FOF-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240014-EG
PAGE 7
NOTICE OF FURTHER PROCEEDINGS OR JUDICIAL REVIEW
The Florida Public Service Commission is required by Section 120.569(1), Florida
Statutes, to notify parties of any administrative hearing or judicial review of Commission orders
that is available under Sections 120.57 or 120.68, Florida Statutes, as well as the procedures and
time limits that apply. 	This notice should not be construed to mean all requests for an
administrative hearing or judicial review will be granted or result in the relief sought.
Any party adversely affected by the Commission's final action in this matter may request:
1) reconsideration of the decision by filing a motion for reconsideration with the Office of
Commission Clerk, 2540 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0850, within
fifteen (15) days of the issuance of this order in the form prescribed by Rule 25-22.060, Florida
Administrative Code; or 2) judicial review by the Florida Supreme Court in the case of an
electric, gas or telephone utility or the First District Court of Appeal in the case of a water and/or
wastewater utility by filing a notice of appeal with the Office of Commission Clerk, and filing a
copy of the notice of appeal and the filing fee with the appropriate court. 	This filing must be
completed within thirty (30) days after the issuance of this order, pursuant to Rule 9.110, Florida
Rules of Appellate Procedure. 	The notice of appeal must be in the form specified in Rule
9.900(a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0430-FOF-EG Attachment A
DOCKET NO. 20240014-EG
PAGE 8

FILED 8/6/2024
DOCUMENT NO. 08254-2024
FPSC - COMMISSION CLERK

BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

In re: Commission review of numeric conservation | DOCKET NO. 20240014-EG
goals (Tampa Electric Company).
FILED: August 6, 2024

JOINT NOTICE OF STIPULATIONS

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0430-FOF-EG Attachment A
DOCKET NO. 20240014-EG
PAGE 9

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0430-FOF-EG Attachment A
DOCKET NO. 20240014-EG
PAGE 10

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0430-FOF-EG DOCKET NO. 20240014-EG
Attachment A
PAGE 11
STIPULATION:
The Parties stipulate and agree that the appropriate Commercial/Industrial demand response credits for establishing Tampa Electric's goals in this proceeding are the credits approved by the Commission in Order No. PSC- 2021-0432-S-EI.
ISSUE 12:
What residential and commercial/industrial summer and winter megawatt (MW) and annual Gigawatt-hour (GWh) goals should be established for the period 2025-2034?
STIPULATION:
The Parties stipulate and agree that the following Residential summer and winter megawatt (MW) and annual Gigawatt-hour (GWh) goals, which include the modification to the Neighborhood Weatherization Program described in Paragraph 4 above, should be established for the period 2025- 2034:
Tampa Electric's 2025-2034 Proposed Residential DSM Goals at the Generator
Year
Summer Demand (MW)
Winter Demand (MW)
Annual Energy (GWh)
Incremental
Incremental
Incremental
2025
7.9
14.0
24.8
2026
7.9
14.0
24.8
2027
8.8
14.6
25.4
2028
8.6
14.5
24.8
2029
8.6
14.5
24.8
2030
9.6
15.2
25.8
2031
9.5
15.1
25.3
2032
9.5
15.1
25.3
2033
9.6
15.2
25.8
2034
9.5
15.1
25.3
4

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0430-FOF-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240014-EG

PAGE 12

ISSUE 13:

STIPULATION:

ISSUE 14:

Attachment A

Weatherization Program described in Paragraph 4 above, should be
established for the period 2025-2034:

Tampa Electric's
2025-2034 Proposed Commercial/Industrial
DSM Goals at the Generator
Summer Demand Winter Demand Annual Energy

Year (MW) (MW) (GWh)

Incremental Incremental Incremental
2025 6.4 5.4 22.2
2026 6.3 5.4 22.2
2027 6.9 5.9 22.3
2028 6.4 5.4 22.3
2029 6.4 5.4 22.3
2030 5.9 5.1 18.6
2031 5.4 4.6 18.6
2032 5.4 4.6 18.6
2033 6.0 5.1 18.6
2034 5.4 4.6 18.6

The cumulative effect of these commercial/industrial goals through 2034
would be a summer MW reduction of 60.5 MW, a winter MW reduction of

51.7 MW and cumulative energy savings of 204.4 GWh.

What goals, if any, should be established for increasing the development of
demand-side renewable energy systems?

The Parties stipulate and agree that the record supports a Commission
finding that no additional goals should be established for demand-side
renewable energy systems.

Should this docket be closed?

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0430-FOF-EG Attachment A
DOCKET NO. 20240014-EG
PAGE 13

STIPULATION: The Parties stipulate and agree that approval of the stipulations set forth
herein will fully resolve the issues and positions of all Parties to this docket
and, therefore, this docket should be closed upon the issuance of an Order
approving these stipulations.

7. The Parties stipulate and agree that Tampa Electric’s proposed DSM goals,
as modified herein, include both RIM- and TRC-passing programs and will deliver meaningful
energy-efficiency savings options to all customers including owners, renters, and low-income
customers, and should be approved.

8. The Parties stipulate and agree that Tampa Electric’s proposed DSM Goals,
as modified herein, are a reasonable approach to meet the requirements of Section 366.82, Florida
Statutes, and Rules 25-17.0021 and 25-17.008, Florida Administrative Code, and will establish
DSM Goals at a reasonable and appropriate level for the period 2025 through 2034 and should be
approved.

9. The Parties stipulate and agree that the stipulations and positions set forth
herein are limited and apply only to Tampa Electric’s proposed DSM Goals in Docket No.
20240014-EG, and in no way impact or limit any of the positions that Parties may take in any other
current or future proceedings before the Commission, including, but not limited to, any other DSM
Goals dockets currently pending before the Commission. Further, no Party agrees, concedes, or
waives any position with respect to any of the issues identified in the Prehearing Order.

10. The Parties stipulate and agree that these stipulations fully resolve their

respective issues in Docket No. 20240014-EG and request that they be approved by the

Commission.

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0430-FOF-EG Attachment A
DOCKET NO. 20240014-EG
PAGE 14

Tampa Electric Company
Name: Malcolm NM. Means

Title: Attorney for Tampa Electric Company

At
Ve

Wyden \. Wes,

Signature:

Date: August 4. 2024

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0430-FOF-EG Attachment A
DOCKET NO. 20240014-EG
PAGE 15

Southern Alliance for Clean Energy
(“SACE”)

Name: William C. Garner

Title: Attorney for Southern Alliance for
Clean Energy (“SACE”)

Stepan seal Oe

Date: G/s [2024

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0430-FOF-EG Attachment A
DOCKET NO. 20240014-EG
PAGE 16

League of United Latin American Citizens
of Florida (““LULAC”) & Florida Rising

Name: Bradley Marshall

Title: Attorney for League of United Latin
American Citizens of Florida (“LULAC”’) &
Florida Rising

Signature: frodlay Marchal

Date: August 5, 2024

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0430-FOF-EG Attachment A
DOCKET NO. 20240014-EG
PAGE 17