Darik Alexander v. Capital One, N.A.

CourtListener 10866248Fladistctapp29 de mai. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________

Case No. 6D2025-1129
Lower Tribunal No. 2023-CA-014550
_____________________________

DARIK ALEXANDER,

Appellant,
v.

CAPITAL ONE, N.A.,

Appellee.
_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.
Heather Pinder Rodriguez, Judge.

May 29, 2026

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Winter Park Hosp., LLC v. On Target Staffing, LLC, 419

So. 3d 306, 311 (Fla. 6th DCA 2025) (“To have the trial court set aside the default

final judgment, WPH had to prove by sworn evidence that (1) its failure to retain

new counsel as ordered by the trial court was the result of excusable neglect, (2) its

affirmative defenses and counterclaim established that it had meritorious defenses

and claims warranting a trial on the merits, and (3) it acted with due diligence from

the time when it learned of the default to the filing for relief.” (emphasis added)).
TRAVER, C.J., and SMITH and MIZE, JJ., concur.

Darik Alexander, Windermere, pro se.

Michael Thiel Debski, of Debski & Associates, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED

2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.