CourtListener 9496787•In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration
In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration
CourtListener 9496787Fla25 de abr. de 2024
Texto completo
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
NOTICE OF CORRECTION
DATE: April 25, 2024
CASE OF: In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of General Practice
and Judicial Administration
DOCKET NO.: SC2023-0837
OPINION FILED: March 21, 2024
ATTENTION: ALL PUBLISHERS
THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE IN THE
ABOVE OPINION:
On p. 4, line 7, “(f)” is changed to “(g)”.
On p. 4, line 12, “(f)” is changed to “(g)”.
On p. 4, line 18, “(f)” is changed to “(g)”.
On p. 13, line 28, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and
removed underline from “must”.
On p. 13, line 29, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and
removed underline from “must”.
On p. 14, line 1, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and
removed underline from “must”.
On p. 14, line 5, deleted the struck-through space and struck-
through word “shall”; added the word “must” after the word “court”;
and deleted the underlined “s” in “submits”.
On p. 14, line 8, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and the
struck-through space after “shall”; added the word “must” after
“court”; and deleted the underlined “s” in “sends”.
On p. 14, line 11, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and
removed underline from “must”.
On p. 14, line 15, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and
removed underline from “must”.
On p. 14, line 17, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and
removed underline from “must”.
On p. 14, line 20, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and the
struck-through space before “shall”; added the word “must” after
“court”; and deleted the underlined “s” in “considers”.
On p. 14, line 25, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and
removed underline from “must”.
On p. 14, line 31, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and
removed underline from “must”.
On p. 15, line 6, struck-through the space after the struck-through
word “court”; and replaced the struck-through word “shall” with the
struck-through word “must”.
On p. 15, line 9, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and
removed underline from “must”.
On p. 15, line 10, deleted the strike-through of space after “copies”
and the struck-through words “shall be”; and the words “must be”
were added before “provided”.
On p. 15, lines 11-12, changed the word “may” to “must”; deleted
the struck-through words “provide for the publication of”; and
added the words “on the circuit’s website” after the words “local
court rules”.
On p. 15, line 13, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and
removed underline from “must”.
On p. 15, line 14, removed strike-through from the word “the”;
deleted the underlined words “The Florida Bar’s”; and removed
strike-through formatting from the words “of The Florida Bar.”
On p. 15, line 21, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and
removed underline from “must”.
On p. 15, line 22, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and
removed underline from “must”.
On p. 15, line 28, the struck-through word “shall” was replaced
with the struck-through word “must”.
On p. 15, line 30, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and
removed underline from “must”.
On p. 15, lines 31, the struck-through word “shall” was changed to
“must”; strike-through formatting was removed from the word “be”
and the space after “be”.
On p. 15, line 33, the sentence “The chief judge of the circuit must
publish all administrative orders of a general and continuing nature
on the circuit’s website.” was added after the word “duplication.”
On p. 15, line 35, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and
removed underline from “must”.
On p. 16, line 4, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and
removed underline from “must”.
On p. 16, line 6, “(f) Individual and Divisional Practices and
Procedures.” was added in bold, and “Every judge who establishes
practices or procedures that apply only when appearing before that
specific judge must publish those practices and procedures on the
circuit’s website. Each division of court that establishes practices
and procedures that apply in that division of court must publish
those practices and procedures on the circuit’s website. No judge or
division may establish a practice or procedure that requires
attorneys or parties to communicate with the court solely by written
letter. Neither a division nor a judge may establish practices or
procedures that contradict established law or rule of procedure. The
chief judge of each circuit should establish procedures to ensure
compliance with the subdivision.” was added.
On p. 16, line 18, “(f)” was changed to “(g)”.
On p. 16, line 32, “(g)” was changed to “(h)”.
On p. 17, line 3, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and
removed underline from “must”.
On p. 17, line 12, “(h)” was changed to “(i)”; and replaced text of (i)
with “[No Change]”.
On p. 17, line 13, “(i)” was changed to “(j)”.
On p. 17, line 15, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and
removed underline from “must”.
On p. 17, line 18, deleted the struck-through word “shall” and
removed underline from “must”.
On p. 17, line 21, deleted the struck-through words “shall be” and
removed underline from “is”.
SIGNED: OPINION CLERK
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.