Gary Leman, et al. v. Orit Tal

2024-2238Fladistctapp3

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed December 31, 2025.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-2238
Lower Tribunal No. 22-31850-SP-05
________________
Gary Leman, et al.,
Appellants,
vs.
Orit Tal,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Diana
Gonzalez-Whyte, Judge.
Solnick Law P.A., and Peter J. Solnick, for appellants.
The Scharf Appellate Group, and Erik W. Scharf, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. 	See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530(a) (“To preserve for appeal a
challenge to the failure of the trial court to make required findings of fact in
2
the final judgment, a party must raise that issue in a motion for rehearing
under this rule.”); Schneider v. Tirikian, 397 So. 3d 1070, 1074 (Fla. 3d DCA
2024) (“The key to preservation is whether the trial court had an opportunity
to correct the purported error.”); Forte v. All Cnty. Towing Inc., 336 So. 3d
316, 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022) (“An award of attorney’s fees will be upheld on
appeal so long as it is supported by competent, substantial evidence.”).

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.