Yitzchok Yoel Kasowitz v. Alison Ruth Kasowitz

Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed December 17, 2025.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-0033
Lower Tribunal No. 23-18053-FC-04
________________
Yitzchok Yoel Kasowitz,
Appellant,
vs.
Alison Ruth Kasowitz,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ivonne
Cuesta, Judge.
Vanessa L. Prieto Law Offices, LLC and Vanessa L. Prieto (Ft.
Lauderdale), for appellant.
Diaz Reus & Targ, LLP and Michael Diaz, Jr. and Zhen Pan and Gabor
Gazso von Klingspor and John Foster, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.

2
Affirmed. See McGuire v. Boscan, 337 So. 3d 124, 127 (“An order
granting an injunction in the domestic violence context is reviewed for abuse
of discretion.” (quoting Chiscul v. Hernandez, 311 So. 3d 55, 57 (Fla. 4th
DCA 2021))); Shojaie v. Gables Ct. Pro. Ctr., Inc., 974 So. 2d 1140, 1141
(Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (“It is the responsibility and duty of the appellant to
provide the appellate court with a record sufficient to review the matter
assigned . . . .” (quoting Gleim v. Gleim, 176 So. 2d 610, 611 (Fla. 3d DCA
1965))); Taylor v. Bateman, 927 So. 2d 1024, 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
(“The piecemeal transcripts deprived this court of the ability to review the
record as a whole. Such record omissions are fatal to an appeal.”); Fay v.
Craig, 99 So. 3d 981, 982 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (“To a large extent appellants
proceed at their peril when they furnish a partial transcript.”).