MANUEL FIGUEROA and NOEMI FIGUEROA VS UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

2024-0734Fla Dist Ct App 6th

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

S IXTH D ISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
S TATE OF F LORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 6D2024-0734
Lower Tribunal No. 2020-CA-001232-CI
_____________________________
M ANUEL FIGUEROA and N OEMI FIGUEROA,
Appellants,
v.
U NIVERSAL PROPERTY & C ASUALTY INSURANCE C OMPANY,
Appellee.
_____________________________
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County.
Christine E. Arendas, Judge.
December 12, 2025
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Rodriguez v. State, 609 So. 2d 493, 499 (Fla. 1992) (“It is
well settled that the specific legal ground upon which a claim is based must be raised
at trial and a claim different than that raised below will not be heard on appeal.”);
Melrose Ventures, LLC v. Uptempo Marketing Corp., 418 So. 3d 217, 220 (Fla. 6th
DCA 2025) (“[N]ew and different arguments untimely raised for the first time in
motions for rehearing which were denied are unpreserved.”).
NARDELLA, WOZNIAK and WHITE, JJ., concur.
2
Melissa A. Giasi, of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for Appellants.
David A. Noel and Kara Rockenbach Link, of Link & Rockenbach, PA, West Palm
Beach, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED

OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 6D2024-0734
Lower Tribunal No. 2020-CA-001232-CI

MANUEL FIGUEROA and NOEMI FIGUEROA,
Appellants,
Vv.
UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County.
Christine E. Arendas, Judge.

December 12, 2025
PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Rodriguez v. State, 609 So. 2d 493, 499 (Fla. 1992) (“It is
well settled that the specific legal ground upon which a claim is based must be raised
at trial and a claim different than that raised below will not be heard on appeal.’’);
Melrose Ventures, LLC v. Uptempo Marketing Corp., 418 So. 3d 217, 220 (Fla. 6th
DCA 2025) (“[N]ew and different arguments untimely raised for the first time in

motions for rehearing which were denied are unpreserved.’’).

NARDELLA, WOZNIAK and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Melissa A. Giasi, of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for Appellants.

David A. Noel and Kara Rockenbach Link, of Link & Rockenbach, PA, West Palm
Beach, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.