Michael Wilkes v. State of Florida

2025-2569Fladistctapp4

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

D ISTRICT C OURT OF A PPEAL O F T HE STATE OF F LORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
MICHAEL WILKES,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-2569
[November 19, 2025]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for
the 	Seventeenth 	Judicial 	Circuit, 	Broward 	County; 	Michael 	A. 	Usan,
Judge; L.T. Case No. 11-740CF10A.
Michael Wilkes, Century, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM .
Affirmed. See Maye v. State, 368 So. 3d 531, 532 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023),
review granted, No. SC2023-1184, 2024 WL 1796831 (Fla. Apr. 25, 2024);
Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 2025) (holding that even if
Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a change of law,
it does not apply retroactively).
KUNTZ , C.J., G ERBER and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur.
* 	* 	*
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL WILKES,
Appellant,

Vv.

STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.

No. 4D2025-2569
[November 19, 2025]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Usan,
Judge; L.T. Case No. 11-740CFI10A.

Michael Wilkes, Century, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Maye v. State, 368 So. 3d 531, 532 (Fla. oth DCA 2023),
review granted, No. SC2023-1184, 2024 WL 1796831 (Fla. Apr. 25, 2024);
Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 2025) (holding that even if
Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a change of law,
it does not apply retroactively).

KUNTZ, C.J., GERBER and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.