Marcus O'Neal Jenkins v. State of Florida

FIFTH DISTRICT C OURT OF A PPEAL
S TATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 5D2025-2225
LT Case No. 16-2010-CF-9956-A
_____________________________
MARCUS O’N EAL JENKINS,
Appellant,
v.
S TATE OF F LORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.
Meredith Charbula, Judge.
Marcus O’Neal Jenkins, Perry, pro se.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heather
Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.
October 9, 2026
P ER C URIAM.
Due to Appellant’s apparent abuse of the legal process by
his/her abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings
attacking his judgment and sentence in Duval County Circuit
Court Case No. 16-2010-CF-9956-A, this Court issued an order
directing Appellant to show cause why he should not be prohibited
from future pro se filings. 	See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48
(Fla. 1999). 	Appellant having failed to file a response and thus

2
failing to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we
conclude that he is abusing the judicial process and should be
barred from further pro se filings.
In order to conserve judicial resources, Appellant is prohibited
from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning
Duval County Circuit Court Case No. 16-2010-CF-9956-A. 	The
Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se
filings concerning the referenced case. 	The Clerk will summarily
reject any future filings regarding the referenced case unless filed
by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. 	See Isley v.
State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is
enough.”). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy
of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of
disciplinary 	proceedings. 	See 	§ 	944.279(1), 	Fla. 	Stat. 	(2020);
Simpkins v. State, 909 So. 2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).
A PPELLANT S ANCTIONED.
L AMBERT , E DWARDS, and H ARRIS, JJ., concur.