Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young, Llp; Ernst & Young U.s., Llp

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEPHEN MORRIS; KELLY
MCDANIEL, on behalf of
themselves and all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ERNST & YOUNG, LLP;
ERNST & YOUNG U.S., LLP,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-16599
D.C. No.
5:12-cv-04964-RMW
OPINION
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed July 9, 2018
Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge, and Sandra S.
Ikuta and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam Opinion

-- 1 of 2 --

MORRIS V. ERNST & YOUNG 2
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion dated May 21,
2018, the opinion of this Court dated August 22, 2016,
834 F.3d 975 is VACATED and judgment is entered
AFFIRMING the district court’s grant of Defendant-
Appellees’ motion to compel arbitration.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --