14-72794•in Re Pesticide Action Network North America v. U.s. Environmental Protection Agency
14-72794Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit10 de dez. de 2015
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
IN RE PESTICIDE ACTION NETWORK
NORTH AMERICA; NATURAL
RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.,
PESTICIDE ACTION NETWORK NORTH
AMERICA; NATURAL RESOURCES
DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.,
Petitioners,
v.
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY,
Respondent.
No. 14-72794
ORDER
Filed December 10, 2015
Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, A. Wallace Tashima,
and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 2 --
IN RE PESTICIDE ACTION NETWORK N. AM. 2
COUNSEL
Patti A. Goldman (argued), Matthew Baca, and Kristen
Boyles, Earthjustice, Seattle, Washington, for Petitioners.
Sam Hirsch, Acting Assistant Attorney General, and Erica
Zilioli (argued), United States Department of Justice,
Environmental Enforcement Section, Washington, D.C.;
Mark Dyner, Office of General Counsel, United States
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., for
Respondents.
ORDER
The United States Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) is directed to take final action by December 30, 2016
on its proposed revocation rule and its final response to
Pesticide Action Network North America and Natural
Resources Defense Council’s (collectively “PANNA”) 2007
petition.
EPA shall file an interim status report with the Court no
later than June 30, 2016. In that report, EPA shall advise the
Court of its efforts to comply with the deadline. EPA shall
also include a detailed explanation of extraordinary
circumstances, if any exist, that make EPA’s compliance with
the final action deadline of December 30, 2016 impracticable
to meet. If EPA’s interim status report includes such an
“extraordinary circumstances” recitation, PANNA shall have
30 days to file a response thereto.
The panel shall retain jurisdiction over any further
proceedings related to this petition.
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.