United States v. 2007-10-16 | 04-55324 | EDWARD JONES VCITY OF LOS ANGELES | precedential | opinion |

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 EDWARD JONES; PATRICIA VINSON;
GEORGE VINSON; THOMAS CASH; No. 04-55324
STANLEY BARGER; ROBERT LEE
D.C. No. PURRIE, CV-03-01142-ER Plaintiffs-Appellants, Central District v. of California,
CITY OF LOS ANGELES; WILLIAM Los Angeles
BRATTON, Chief; CHARLES BECK, ORDER
Captain, in their official capacity,
Defendants-Appellees. 
Filed October 15, 2007
Before: Pamela Ann Rymer and Kim McLane Wardlaw,
Circuit Judges, and Edward C. Reed, Jr.,* District Judge.
ORDER
The parties have filed a joint motion informing us that they
have settled this action and seeking dismissal of the appeal,
remand and withdrawal of our opinion, reported at 444 F.3d
1118 (9th Cir. 2006). Granting the motion in full, we dismiss
this appeal as moot, vacate our opinion in Jones v. City of Los
Angeles, 444 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2006), and remand the
action to the district court for further proceedings consistent
*The Honorable Edward C. Reed, Jr., Senior United States District
Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.
14139

-- 1 of 4 --

with this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14140 JONES v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

-- 2 of 4 --

-- 3 of 4 --

PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2007 Thomson/West.

-- 4 of 4 --