United States v. 2007-04-10 | 03-35669 | ROSS-SIMMONS HARDWD VWEYERHAIUSER | precedential | opinion |

03-35669Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit10 de abr. de 2007

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF SILETZ
INDIANS OF OREGON; SMOKEY POINT
HARDWOOD, INC.,
Plaintiffs, Nos. 03-35669
and 03-35984
ROSS-SIMMONS HARDWOOD LUMBER D.C. No. 
COMPANY, INC., CV-00-01693-OMP
Plaintiff-Appellee, ORDER
v.
WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellant. 
On Remand From The United States Supreme Court
Filed April 11, 2007
Before: Thomas G. Nelson and Johnnie B. Rawlinson,
Circuit Judges, and William W Schwarzer,*
Senior District Judge.
COUNSEL
Stephen V. Bomse, M. Laurence Popofsky and Heather N.
Leal, Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe LLP, San Francisco,
California, for the appellant.
Michael E. Haglund, Haglund, Kelley, Horngren & Jones,
*The Honorable William W Schwarzer, Senior United States District
Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
4067

-- 1 of 4 --

LLP, and Roy Pulvers, Lindsay, Hart, Neil & Weigler, LLP,
Portland, Oregon, for the appellee.
ORDER
The judgment of the district court is vacated and the case
is remanded to the district court for further proceedings con-
sistent with the decision of the Supreme Court of the United
States in Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons, 127 S.Ct. 1069
(2007).
In fulfilling this mandate, the district court may hold such
hearings and enter such orders as it deems appropriate.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4068 ROSS-SIMMONS HARDWOOD v. WEYERHAEUSER CO.

-- 2 of 4 --

-- 3 of 4 --

PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2007 Thomson/West.

-- 4 of 4 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.