United States v. 2005-10-13 | 02-15475 | KESSER VCAMBRA | precedential | opinion |

02-15475Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit13 de out. de 2005

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 RICHARD CRAIG KESSER,
Petitioner-Appellant, No. 02-15475
v.  D.C. No.
CV-96-03452-PJH STEVEN J. CAMBRA, JR., Warden,
Respondent-Appellee. 
 JENNIFER GAYLE LEAHY, No. 01-17467
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No.
v.  CV-97-01407-PJH
TEENA FARMON, Warden, ORDER
Respondent-Appellee. 
Filed October 14, 2005
Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active
judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard
by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-
judge panel opinion in Kesser v. Cambra, No. 02-15475, shall
not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district
court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the
en banc court.
14343

-- 1 of 2 --

PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2005 Thomson/West.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.