22-16213•Ali R. Poorsina v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.a.
22-16213Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit24 de jul. de 2023
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALI R. POORSINA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 22-16213
D.C. No. 4:21-cv-05098-DMR
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Donna M. Ryu, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**
Submitted July 18, 2023***
Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Ali R. Poorsina appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
for lack of standing his action arising out of foreclosure proceedings and the
approval of a mortgage loan. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28
U.S.C. § 636(c).
*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
JUL 24 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 2 --
2 22-16213
review de novo a dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P 12(b)(1). Gingery v. City of
Glendale, 831 F.3d 1222, 1226 (9th Cir. 2016). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Poorsina’s action for lack of standing
because Poorsina failed to allege facts sufficient to demonstrate that Wells Fargo’s
approval of a mortgage loan made to nonparties injured Poorsina, that Wells Fargo
caused Poorsina to suffer any harm, or that any injury to Poorsina could be
redressed by a favorable decision. See TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 141 S.Ct.
2190, 2203 (2021) (explaining requirements of Article III standing).
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Poorsina leave to
amend because further amendment would have been futile. See Cervantes v.
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011) (setting forth
standard of review and stating that leave to amend may be denied where
amendment would be futile).
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.