Jeremiah James Petlig v. C. HARRAWAY, Officer

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEREMIAH JAMES PETLIG,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

C. HARRAWAY, Officer,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

SCOTT CARTER-ELDRED; et al.,

Defendants.

No. 19-35672

D.C. No. 2:18-cv-00721-MJP

MEMORANDUM
*

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Washington
Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 14, 2020
**

Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Washington state prisoner Jeremiah James Petlig appeals pro se from the

*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED

JUL 22 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

2 19-35672
district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging
inadequate medical care while he was a pretrial detainee. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Gordon v. County of Orange, 888
F.3d 1118, 1122 (9th Cir. 2018), and we affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment because Petlig failed
to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Harraway’s response to
Petlig’s request for immediate medical attention was objectively unreasonable. See
Gordon, 888 F.3d at 1124-25 (setting forth objective deliberate indifference
standard for Fourteenth Amendment inadequate medical care claims brought by
pretrial detainees).
AFFIRMED.