United States v. 2020-06-10 | 19-71560 | JUAN TORRES-VASQUEZ V. WILLIAM BARR | nonprecedential | memorandum disposition |

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN DAVID TORRES-VASQUEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 19-71560

Agency No. A203-290-712

MEMORANDUM
*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 2, 2020
**

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Juan David Torres-Vasquez, a native and citizen of Colombia, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying a waiver of inadmissibility.
We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary decision denying a

*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED

JUN 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

2 19-71560
waiver of inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h)(1)(B), where Torres-Vasquez
does not raise a colorable due process claim or question of law. See 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Mendoza v. Holder, 623 F.3d 1299, 1302 (9th Cir. 2010). We
also lack jurisdiction to review Torres-Vasquez’s unexhausted contention that the
IJ should have allowed him additional opportunity to submit corroborating
evidence. See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (the court
“lack[s] jurisdiction to review legal claims not presented in an alien’s
administrative proceedings before the BIA.”).
Torres-Vasquez’s motion for a stay of removal is denied as moot.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.