United States v. 2020-04-17 | 18-73347 | JULIO CORDOVA-MARTINEZ V. WILLIAM BARR | nonprecedential | memorandum disposition |

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO CORDOVA-MARTINEZ, AKA
Marvin Campos, AKA Juan Sanchez-
Gomez,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 18-73347

Agency No. A206-677-042

MEMORANDUM
*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 7, 2020
**

Before: TASHIMA, BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Julio Cordova-Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is
governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for

*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED

APR 17 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

2 18-73347
review.
Cordova-Martinez does not raise, and therefore waives, any challenge to the
agency’s removability determination and the denial of cancellation of removal.
See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not
specifically raised and argued in an opening brief are waived).
We lack jurisdiction to review Cordova-Martinez’s due process claims. See
Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) (finding no jurisdiction to
review due process claims based on correctable procedural errors that were not
raised to the agency).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.