United States v. 2020-04-16 | 19-16373 | ROBERT GUEVARA V. CORIZON HEALTH | nonprecedential | memorandum disposition |

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT P. GUEVARA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CORIZON HEALTH, INC., Contract
Medical Provider at A.D.O.C; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 19-16373

D.C. No. 2:18-cv-03244-GMS-CDB

MEMORANDUM
*

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 7, 2020
**

Before: TASHIMA, BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Robert P. Guevara appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate
indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C.

*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED

APR 16 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

2 19-16373
§ 1915A. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Guevara’s action because Guevara
failed to allege facts sufficient to show that defendants disregarded an excessive
risk to Guevara’s serious medical needs. See Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341-
42 (9th Cir. 2010) (although pro se pleadings are construed liberally, plaintiff must
present factual allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief); Toguchi
v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056-60 (9th Cir. 2004) (a prison official is deliberately
indifferent only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to inmate
health; medical malpractice, negligence, or a difference of opinion concerning the
course of treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference); Roberts v.
Spalding, 783 F.2d 867, 870 (9th Cir. 1986) (a prisoner has no constitutional right
to outside medical care to supplement the medical care provided by the prison).
AFFIRMED.