United States of America v. Shawn Patrick Malarkey

17-35445Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2 de dez. de 2019

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SHAWN PATRICK MALARKEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-35445
D.C. Nos. 9:16-cv-00083-DWM
9:11-cr-00045-DWM-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 22, 2019**
Portland, Oregon
Before: FARRIS, BEA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Shawn Patrick Malarkey appeals the district court’s order denying his
motion to vacate his sentence imposed in connection with Count Two of the
indictment: use of a firearm during a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 924(c)(1)(A), where the predicate “crime of violence” is armed robbery
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
DEC 2 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2
involving controlled substances under 18 U.S.C. § 2118(c)(1). We affirm.
For the reasons set forth in our concurrently filed opinion in United States v.
Burke, No. 17-35446, we hold that armed robbery involving controlled substances
qualifies as a crime of violence under § 924(c)(3)(A).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.