United States of America v. JOSEPH ADAM McILWAIN

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOSEPH ADAM McILWAIN,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 19-10117
D.C. No. 1:18-cr-00107-SOM-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Hawaii
Susan O. Mollway, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 18, 2019**
Before: FARRIS, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Joseph Adam McIlwain appeals from the revocation of supervised release
and the 2-month sentence and 34-month term of supervised release imposed upon
revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), McIlwain’s
counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
SEP 25 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 19-10117
motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided McIlwain the
opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or
answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --