Gloria Villa De Carrillo v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GLORIA VILLA DE CARRILLO,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 18-70327
Agency No. A070-740-768
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 19, 2019**
Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Gloria Villa De Carrillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen
removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for
abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597
F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
FEB 21 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 18-70327
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Villa De Carrillo’s untimely
motion to reopen where Villa De Carrillo failed to demonstrate materially changed
country conditions in Mexico to qualify for an exception to the time limitations for
a motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); see also Najmabadi, 597 F.3d
at 991-92 (evidence must be “qualitatively different” to warrant reopening).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --