Jose Pablo Ramon-Ricardo v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE PABLO RAMON-RICARDO,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 15-73445
Agency No. A095-619-186
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 19, 2019**
Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Jose Pablo Ramon-Ricardo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
from an immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reopen removal
proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for
an abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
FEB 21 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 15-70970
F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Ramon-Ricardo’s untimely
motion to reopen where Ramon-Ricardo failed to establish materially changed
country conditions to qualify for an exception to the time limitation for filing a
motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987-
90 (petitioner failed to show evidence was “qualitatively different” to warrant
reopening).
We reject Ramon-Ricardo’s contention that the BIA failed to address relief
under the Convention Against Torture.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --