Jose Guadalupe Campoy Cruz v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE GUADALUPE CAMPOY CRUZ,
Petitioner,
v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney
General,
Respondent.
No. 17-71686
Agency No. A088-712-539
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted August 15, 2018**
Before: FARRIS, BYBEE, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Jose Guadalupe Campoy Cruz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro
se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal
from an immigration judge’s decision denying cancellation of removal. We dismiss
the petition for review.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
AUG 28 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 17-71686
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that
Campoy Cruz failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his
qualifying relatives. See Vilchiz-Soto v. Holder, 688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 2012).
Campoy Cruz’s contentions that the agency failed to consider several pieces of
evidence are not supported by the record and do not amount to colorable claims
that would invoke our jurisdiction. See id., 688 F.3d at 644 (absent a colorable
legal or constitutional claim, the court lacks jurisdiction to review the agency’s
discretionary determination regarding hardship); Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424
F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005) (“To be colorable in this context, . . . the claim must
have some possible validity.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --