United States of America v. ISMAEL MAYA-PIZANO, AKA Ismael Maya Pizano

17-10130Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17 de out. de 2017

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ISMAEL MAYA-PIZANO, AKA Ismael
Maya Pizano,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-10130
D.C. No.
2:16-cr-00121-JAM-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2017**
San Francisco, California
Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, REINHARDT, and O’MALLEY,*** Circuit
Judges.
FILED
OCT 17 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
*** The Honorable Kathleen M. O’Malley, United States Circuit Judge for
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.

-- 1 of 2 --

Ismael Maya-Pizano appealed the district court’s sentence prior to our
decision in United States v. Martinez-Lopez, 864 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2017). Maya-
Pizano concedes that Martinez-Lopez forecloses his appeal. Accordingly, we
affirm the sentence.
AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.