United States of America v. Fredy Yovani Hernandez- Maldonado, a.k.a. Fredy Guanny Hernandez, a.k.a. Fredy Y.…

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
FREDY YOVANI HERNANDEZ-
MALDONADO, a.k.a. Fredy Guanny
Hernandez, a.k.a. Fredy Y. Hernandez, a.k.a.
Fredy Yovani Hernandez, a.k.a. Fredy
Yovani Hernandez-Maldonado,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-10158
D.C. No. 4:14-cr-01240-CKJ
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 11, 2017**
Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Fredy Yovani Hernandez-Maldonado appeals from the district court’s
judgment and challenges the 25-month sentence imposed on remand following his
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
APR 18 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 16-10158
guilty-plea conviction for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
§ 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Hernandez-
Maldonado’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief,
along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided
Hernandez-Maldonado the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro
se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --