United States of America v. RUDOLPH EMMANUEL ENGLETON, Jr., a.k.a. C-Cat

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RUDOLPH EMMANUEL ENGLETON,
Jr., a.k.a. C-Cat,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-50064
D.C. No.
2:14-cr-00303-JAK-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 17, 2017**
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Rudolph Emmanuel Engleton, Jr. appeals from the district court’s judgment
and challenges his 48-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm
and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Pursuant to Anders v.
FILED
MAR 21 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Engleton’s counsel has filed a brief stating that
there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --