Gary Cecil v. DANIEL PARAMO, Warden;

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GARY CECIL,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-55004
D.C. No. 3:15-cv-02137-GPC-
NLS
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Gonzalo P. Curiel, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2016**
Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Gary Cecil, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district
court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process and
access-to-court claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
In his opening brief, Cecil failed to address any of the grounds for dismissal,
FILED
DEC 22 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

and has therefore waived his appeal of the district court’s order. See Indep. Towers
of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e will not
consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief.”);
Acosta-Huerta v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1993) (issues not supported by
argument in pro se appellant’s opening brief are waived).
AFFIRMED.
16-55004 2

-- 2 of 2 --