United States of America v. Alvaro Domarco-Sanchez

15-10498Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit1 de ago. de 2016

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ALVARO DOMARCO-SANCHEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-10498
D.C. No. 2:94-cr-00251-GEB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Garland E. Burrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 26, 2016**
Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Alvaro Domarco-Sanchez appeals pro se from the district court’s order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Domarco-Sanchez contends that he is entitled to a sentence reduction under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
AUG 1 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 15-10498
Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We review de novo whether a
district court had authority to modify a sentence under section 3582(c)(2). See
United States v. Leniear, 574 F.3d 668, 672 (9th Cir. 2009). The district court
correctly concluded that Domarco-Sanchez is ineligible for a sentence reduction
because Amendment 782 did not lower his applicable sentencing range. See 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); Leniear, 574 F.3d at 673-74. Because the district court
lacked authority to reduce Domarco-Sanchez’s sentence, it had no cause to
consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S.
817, 826-27 (2010).
To the extent that Domarco-Sanchez seeks to challenge his sentence as
procedurally erroneous and substantively unreasonable, these claims are not
cognizable in a section 3582(c)(2) proceeding. See Dillon, 560 U.S. at 831
(section 3582(c)(2) does not permit a plenary resentencing proceeding).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.