United States of America v. Jose Juan Martinez-Martinez, a.k.a. Jose Juan Martinez

15-10142Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit1 de ago. de 2016

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOSE JUAN MARTINEZ-MARTINEZ,
a.k.a. Jose Juan Martinez,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-10142
D.C. No. 4:14-cr-00943-JAS
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
James A. Soto, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 26, 2016**
Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Jose Juan Martinez-Martinez appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 36-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for
FILED
AUG 01 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

attempted reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Martinez-Martinez contends that the district court abused its discretion by
departing upwards on the basis of its conclusion that Martinez-Martinez’s offense
level substantially understated the seriousness of his prior convictions. Our review
of Martinez-Martinez’s challenge to the district court’s decision to depart under
note 7 of the commentary to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 is limited to determining whether
the court imposed a substantively reasonable sentence. See United States v.
Vasquez-Cruz, 692 F.3d 1001, 1005 (9th Cir. 2012). Contrary to Martinez-
Martinez’s argument, the above-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in
light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the
circumstances, including Martinez-Martinez’s criminal history and the fact that he
attempted to reenter the country within two months of being deported. See Gall v.
United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).
AFFIRMED.
15-10142 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.