GELACIO DELORES PANZO, AKA Gelasio Dolores Panzo, AKA Geracio Panzo v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General

14-71976Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit15 de dez. de 2015

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GELACIO DELORES PANZO, AKA
Gelasio Dolores Panzo, AKA Geracio
Panzo,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 14-71976
Agency No. A095-758-802
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 9, 2015**
Before: WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Gelacio Delores Panzo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an
FILED
DEC 15 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

immigration judge’s decision denying his request for voluntary departure. We
dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary denial of Panzo’s
application for voluntary departure where Panzo presents no question of law that
would invoke our jurisdiction. See Gil v. Holder, 651 F.3d 1000, 1003 (9th Cir.
2011) (overruled on other grounds by Moncrieffe v. Holder, 133 S.Ct. 1678
(2013)) (this court has no jurisdiction to review discretionary denials of voluntary
departure, but retains jurisdiction to review questions of law or constitutional
challenges to denials of such relief); see also Corro-Barragan v. Holder, 718 F.3d
1174, 1176-77 (9th Cir. 2013) (same).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
14-71976 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.