Darryl L. Hawkins v. LOUIS W. WINN, Jr.

14-15201Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 de jul. de 2015

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DARRYL L. HAWKINS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
LOUIS W. WINN, Jr.,
Respondent - Appellee.
No. 14-15201
D.C. No. 4:13-cv-00049-BGM
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Bruce G. Macdonald, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**
Submitted July 21, 2015***
Before: CANBY, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Federal prisoner Darryl L. Hawkins appeals pro se from the district court’s
judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the denial of a section
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge.
*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
JUL 27 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 14-15201
2241 petition, see Tablada v. Thomas, 533 F.3d 800, 805 (9th Cir. 2008), and we
affirm.
Hawkins was arrested on November 13, 1993. He acknowledges that he
has received credit towards his federal sentence for the time between his arrest on
November 13, 1993, and October 31, 1995, the day before his state sentence
commenced. However, he argues that he is also entitled to credit towards his
federal sentence for the period between the commencement of his state sentence on
November 1, 1995, and the expiration of his state sentence on June 5, 2005,
because he was allegedly in primary federal custody during that time. Contrary to
this argument, the record reflects that Hawkins was in primary state custody and
received credit against his state sentence for this time period. He is, therefore, not
entitled to any additional federal credit. See 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b); United States v.
Wilson, 503 U.S. 329, 337 (1992) (defendant may not receive “double credit for his
detention time”).
Hawkins’ motion for judicial notice and motion for an evidentiary hearing
are denied.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.