United States of America v. Benito Ledesma-Sanchez

14-10263Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit25 de jun. de 2015

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BENITO LEDESMA-SANCHEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 14-10263
D.C. No. 4:13-cr-00591-RCC
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Raner C. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 22, 2015**
Before: HAWKINS, GRABER, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Benito Ledesma-Sanchez appeals from the 64-month sentence imposed upon
remand for resentencing following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after
deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
JUN 25 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

Ledesma-Sanchez contends that the district court violated Federal Rule of
Criminal Procedure 32(i)(3)(B) by failing to make an express ruling about whether
he had a prior conviction for robbery that would support a 16-level enhancement.
The district court expressly determined that the 16-level enhancement validly
applied. Accordingly, the court satisfied the requirements of Rule 32. See Fed. R.
Crim. P. 32(i)(3)(B).
AFFIRMED.
14-10263 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.