United States of America v. Juan Carlos Arellano- Rodriguez, a.k.a. Juan Carlos Arellano Rodriguez

13-10670Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit5 de fev. de 2015

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JUAN CARLOS ARELLANO-
RODRIGUEZ, a.k.a. Juan Carlos Arellano
Rodriguez,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 13-10670
D.C. No. 4:13-cr-00822-JGZ-
BPV-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 30, 2014 **
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Juan Carlos Arellano-Rodriguez appeals from the district court’s judgment
and challenges his 41-month sentence for re-entry after deportation, in violation of
8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
FILED
FEB 05 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

Arellano-Rodriguez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for
relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided
Arellano-Rodriguez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. He has
filed a supplemental brief, and the government has filed an answering brief.
Arellano-Rodriguez has waived his right to appeal his 41-month sentence.
Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal
waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88
(9th Cir. 2009).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.