United States of America v. Angel Ocampo-Soto, a.k.a. Jose Paredes-Morales, a.k.a. Jose Peredez- Morales

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANGEL OCAMPO-SOTO, a.k.a. Jose
Paredes-Morales, a.k.a. Jose Peredez-
Morales,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 13-10577
D.C. No. 2:13-cr-01105-SRB-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 30, 2014 **
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Angel Ocampo-Soto appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 63-month sentence for reentry after
deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
FILED
FEB 05 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

U.S. 738 (1967), Ocampo-Soto’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no
grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
provided Ocampo-Soto the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro
se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Ocampo-Soto has waived his right to appeal his conviction and 63-month
sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the
appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974,
986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --