United States of America v. David Shumilo, a.k.a. Russian Boy

13-50444Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit22 de dez. de 2014

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID SHUMILO, a.k.a. Russian Boy,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 13-50444
D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00939-GW-51
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 30, 2014**
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
David Shumilo appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his
guilty-plea conviction and 131-month sentence for a racketeer influenced and
corrupt organizations conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), and
possession of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence or drug trafficking
FILED
DEC 22 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), Shumilo’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no
grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
provided Shumilo the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se
supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Shumilo has waived his right to appeal his conviction and 131-month
sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the
appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974,
986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.