United States of America v. Guadalupe Diaz-Cruz

13-50621Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit12 de dez. de 2014

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GUADALUPE DIAZ-CRUZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 13-50621
D.C. No. 3:13-cr-02485-BEN
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 9, 2014**
Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Guadalupe Diaz-Cruz appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 36-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for
being a removed alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
DEC 12 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

Diaz-Cruz contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because
the court failed to grant a downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3(b), which
authorizes the district court to depart when the defendant’s criminal history
category overstates the seriousness of his criminal history. Our review of a district
court’s decision whether to depart under section 4A1.3 is limited to determining
whether the court imposed a substantively reasonable sentence. See United States
v. Ellis, 641 F.3d 411, 421-22 (9th Cir. 2011). The district court did not abuse its
discretion in imposing Diaz-Cruz’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S.
38, 51 (2007). The record reflects that the court varied upwards from the parties’
sentencing recommendation in light of Diaz-Cruz’s history of driving under the
influence and immigration violations. The sentence, 12 months above the top of
the advisory Guidelines range, is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances. See id.
AFFIRMED.
13-50621 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.