Lourdes Felix-Garcia, a.k.a. Lourdes Felix v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LOURDES FELIX-GARCIA, a.k.a.
Lourdes Felix,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 13-70607
Agency No. A099-828-756
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 25, 2014**
Before: HAWKINS, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Lourdes Felix-Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of
an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to
reopen removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review.
FILED
JUN 26 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s order because Felix-Garcia filed
her petition for review beyond the mandatory 30-day filing deadline. See 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(b)(1) (“The petition for review must be filed not later than 30 days after the
date of the final order of removal.”); see also Anderson v. Holder, 673 F.3d 1089,
1094 (9th Cir. 2012) (“The thirty-day time limit for filing a petition for review,
under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1), ‘is mandatory and jurisdictional, and cannot be
tolled.’” (citation omitted)). Felix-Garcia’s opening brief contains no assertion of
official misleading or regulatory noncompliance that could trigger an exception to
the filing deadline. See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010)
(“[W]e generally will not take up arguments not raised in an alien’s opening brief
before this court.”); cf. Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 2003)
(discussing exceptions to the filing deadline).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
13-70607 2

-- 2 of 2 --